Nuclear Fission, Take 2: The Thorium–Hydrocarbon Economy (Part 1 of several)

Nuclear Fission, Take 2: The Thorium–Hydrocarbon Economy  (Part 1 of several)


Enrico Fermi was one of the key scientists in the Manhattan Project, the American project that developed the nuclear fission bombs used to end World War II. He led the team that built the pile and operated the first manmade self-sustaining fission reactor.

Fermi famously opined that there should only be nuclear fission power reactors if the technology were forgiving enough that workers would have time to discuss any breakdowns over a cup of coffee before taking action.

Thorium fission reactors (at least a few proposed designs) could be that more forgiving technology. They also have advantages in lower ore requirements, less processing required, hotter operation (hence potentially greater operating efficiency), less energetic neutrons, greater safety, considerably less waste storage mass, and considerably less waste storage time. In addition, the high temperatures possible for thorium reactors opens possibilities for synthetic fuels production. A major advantage and disadvantage of thorium is that a

Their greatest disadvantage is that they do not yet exist. Although, thorium reactors have many similarities to uranium and plutonium reactors, the differences are sufficient to require developments that are in many ways comparable to building that earlier industry. Moreover, thorium reactors will have the same anti-nuclear enemies as uranium–plutonium reactors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Look to the Weeds in Saving the World before Breakfast

Every Little Energy Bit Helps

2023 Climate Skeptics Conference: "We’re Winning!" No, They’re Not—But How they Could Win